Encouraging beneficials

Chemical Control

Chemistry can still have an important role in IPM, but every treatment changes the biological system. The aim is to control unacceptable pest pressure while preserving as much biological control as possible.

Chemistry within IPM

Chemical control and biological control do not have to be opposing strategies. In a well-managed IPM programme, chemistry can be used selectively when pest pressure, crop stage or commercial risk requires a faster response.

The important question is not simply “Will this kill the pest?” but also:

  • What beneficial insects are already present?
  • How selective is the treatment in this situation?
  • How long could residues affect future releases?
  • Can the problem be treated locally rather than across the whole crop?
  • What is the biological recovery plan afterwards?

Good chemical decisions consider what happens after the spray as well as what happens immediately after application.

Immediate control versus system stability

A chemical treatment may reduce pest pressure rapidly. That can be valuable when crop quality or yield is at immediate risk.

However, treatments can also affect predators, parasitoids and other organisms involved in biological control. The size of that effect depends on the active ingredient, dose, timing, application method, beneficial species and life stage.

Immediate objective

  • Reduce damaging pest pressure
  • Protect sensitive crop stages
  • Contain rapidly expanding hotspots
  • Prevent unacceptable quality loss

Longer-term objective

  • Preserve useful beneficial populations
  • Avoid unnecessary biological resets
  • Reduce repeated corrective treatments
  • Restore biological pressure quickly afterwards

Selectivity is more than the product name

A product may be considered relatively selective, but its real-world effect depends on how it is used.

  • Active ingredient: different modes of action affect beneficial groups differently
  • Dose: exposure level influences non-target effects
  • Coverage: full-canopy treatment exposes more organisms than a targeted application
  • Timing: beneficial life stage and activity at application matter
  • Residual activity: residues may affect beneficials introduced later
  • Application zone: foliage, flowers and growing media may contain different beneficial communities

“Selective” should therefore be treated as a practical compatibility question, not as an absolute guarantee of no impact.

Residual activity matters

The effect of a treatment does not necessarily end when the spray deposit dries. Some residues may continue to affect introduced predators or parasitoids for a period afterwards.

Before releasing biological controls after treatment, consider:

  • The active ingredient used
  • The date of application
  • The beneficial species being introduced
  • Where that beneficial lives and feeds
  • Available compatibility or side-effect information
  • Current product label and professional guidance

This is particularly important when a biological programme is being restarted after corrective chemistry.

Protect refuges where possible

If pest pressure is localised, whole-crop treatment may not always be necessary. Targeting hotspots can reduce the area exposed and preserve beneficial insects elsewhere in the crop.

Target hotspots Treat the area creating commercial risk rather than automatically treating everything.
Protect margins Flowering strips and refuges can help beneficial populations recover.
Protect unaffected crop Untreated areas can retain predators and parasitoids.
Re-scout afterwards Judge whether treatment contained the problem before automatically repeating it.

Resistance management

Resistance is a predictable consequence of repeated selection pressure. Pest populations containing less-sensitive individuals are more likely to survive repeated exposure and contribute to later generations.

  • Avoid unnecessary repeated treatments
  • Follow label restrictions and resistance-management guidance
  • Use appropriate mode-of-action rotation where required
  • Do not rely on increasing dose to compensate for declining performance
  • Use biological and cultural controls to reduce selection pressure

Strong biological control can reduce the number of chemical interventions required and therefore reduce selection pressure over time.

Secondary pest flare-ups

A treatment aimed at one pest can sometimes change the balance of other organisms in the crop.

If natural enemies of a secondary pest are reduced, that pest may become more visible afterwards even though it was not the original target.

This is another reason to continue whole-crop scouting after treatment rather than monitoring only the original pest.

Decision framework: spray, introduce, top up or support?

In commercial horticulture the decision is rarely simply “spray or don't spray”. The better question is: what is the least disruptive action that keeps crop risk acceptable?

1

Is the crop at immediate commercial risk?

Consider rate of pest increase, crop stage, visible damage, yield risk, quality standards and market tolerance.

2

Are beneficials already present?

Look for predators, parasitoids, eggs, larvae, parasitised pests and evidence that pest spread is slowing.

3

Is biology being limited by the environment?

Check temperature, humidity, crop stress, canopy conditions, previous chemical use and available habitat.

4

Choose the least disruptive effective action

Support, introduce, top up, target hotspots or use corrective chemistry depending on the actual crop risk.

Introduce

Appropriate where pest pressure is present but biological control has not yet established sufficiently.

  • Introduce before pest populations peak where possible
  • Match the beneficial to pest, crop and environment
  • Allow time for establishment

Top up

Useful when beneficials are already working but pest growth is beginning to outrun the existing population.

  • Reinforce known hotspots
  • Maintain population continuity
  • Use scouting trends to judge frequency

Support

Sometimes the population is present but conditions are limiting performance.

  • Improve habitat or flowering resources
  • Correct avoidable crop stress
  • Manage environmental conditions where possible

Contain

Corrective chemistry may be justified when commercial risk is too high to wait for biological control alone.

  • Use an appropriate selective option where available
  • Target the problem as narrowly as practical
  • Plan biological recovery immediately afterwards

After treatment — rebuild deliberately

Corrective treatment should not be the end of the IPM plan. Once immediate pest pressure is contained, ask what needs to happen next.

  1. Re-scout the crop and confirm the treatment effect
  2. Assess surviving beneficial activity
  3. Check compatibility and residual restrictions
  4. Reintroduce or top up beneficials when appropriate
  5. Correct environmental or crop factors that contributed to the outbreak
  6. Continue monitoring for rebound or secondary pests

The Biopredator approach

Use deliberately Treat when crop risk justifies it
Be selective Protect biological leverage
Target pressure Avoid unnecessary whole-crop disruption
Plan recovery Return biological control quickly

The objective is not to avoid chemistry at all costs. It is to use it without unnecessarily dismantling the biological system that provides longer-term control.

Use the Biopredator tools

Pest identification, risk assessment, biological recommendations and release planning can be used together to support an integrated decision.